Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

In vitro studies on anti-diabetic and anti-ulcer potentials of Jatropha gossypifolia (Euphorbiaceae)

Hammad Saleem1,2 , Irshad Ahmad2, M Ashraf3, M Shoaib Ali Gill1, Muhammad Faisal Nadeem1, M Nabeel Shahid1, Kashif Barkat2

1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (IPS), University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore; 2Department of Pharmacy; 3Department of biochemistry and Biotechnology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

For correspondence:-  Hammad Saleem   Email: hammad.saleem@uvas.edu.pk   Tel:+923357885316

Received: 9 April 2015        Accepted: 5 December 2015        Published: 29 January 2016

Citation: Saleem H, Ahmad I, Ashraf M, Gill MS, Nadeem MF, Shahid MN, et al. In vitro studies on anti-diabetic and anti-ulcer potentials of Jatropha gossypifolia (Euphorbiaceae). Trop J Pharm Res 2016; 15(1):121-125 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v15i1.17

© 2016 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate α-glucosidase and α-chymotrypsin enzyme inhibitory activity of Jatropha gossypifolia as a probable remedy for the management of diabetes and ulcer.
Methods:Different extracts and fractions of the root, leaf and stem bark of the plant were screened for their α-glucosidase and α-chymotrypsin inhibitory activity using standard in vitro inhibition assays. Acarbose and chymostatin were used as positive control, respectively.
Results:n-Butanol and ethyl acetate fraction showed maximum enzyme inhibition for α-glucosidase with 67.93 ± 0.66 and 67.67 ± 0.71 % and half maximal concentration (IC50) of 218.47 ± 0.23 and 213.45 ± 0.12 µg/ml, respectively. Dichloromethane and ethyl acetate leaf fractions exhibited maximum α-chymotrypsin inhibition activity of 85.08 ± 0.38 and 83.87 ± 0.70 %, and IC50 of 133.1 ± 0.68 and 134.5 ± 0.12 µg/ml, respectively, Acarbose exhibited enzyme inhibition activity of 92.14 ± 0.38 % with IC50 of 38.24 ± 0.1 µg/ml, while chymostatin exhibited 93.67 ± 0.38 % enzyme inhibition and IC50 of 8.24 ± 0.11 µg/ml.
Conclusion:The presence of bioactive secondary metabolities with enzyme-inhibiting activity lends some support for the traditional use of this plant in the management of diabetes and ulcer. However, further investigation of the plant including identification of its active components is required.

Keywords: a-Chymotrypsin, a-Glucosidase, Inhibition, Jatropha gossypifolia, Anti-diabetic, Anti-ulcer

Introduction

Plants have always played a major role in the treatment of human and animal diseases as a therapeutic source for traditional medicine [1]. Enzymes are usually made up of proteins that are helpful in catalyzing chemical reactions. Enzymes increase the rate of reactions until they acquire the equilibrium, although they do not alter thermodynamic properties of the reaction [2].

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disorder of metabolism caused by an absolute or relative lack of insulin. It is characterized by hyperglycemia in postprandial and fasting state, and its severe form is accompanied by ketosis and protein wasting [3].  Elevated postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) is one of the risk factors [4]. PPHG is elevated by the action of α-glucosidase and α-amylase. Inhibition of these enzymes plays a major role in managing PPHG in diabetic patients. Inhibition of α-glucosidase enzyme activity leads to a reduction in disaccharide hydrolysis which has beneficial effects on glycemic index control in diabetic patients [5,6].

Several α-glucosidase inhibitors have been isolated from medicinal plants for the development of new drugs with increased potency and lower adverse effects than the existing drugs [7]. α-Chymotrypsin is a serine protease enzyme, which acts to alleviate ulcers and digesting the polypeptide of damaged tissue [8]. Recently, serine protease inhibitors from potato and other plants have also been reported to have inhibitory effects on tumor cell growth [9,10]. Such inhibitors have potential therapeutic use. Herbal medicines become important factors in the treatment of gastro-duodenal diseases, as they prove themselves to be free of side effects and are less expensive than synthetic drugs. Clinical research has confirmed the efficiency of several plants for the treatment of gastroduodenal diseases [11,12]. The medicinal properties of many plants are mainly assigned to the flavonoids present, but they may be influenced also by other compounds such as coumarins, alkaloids, terpenoids, tannins, phenolic acids and antioxidant micronutrients such as Cu, Mn and Zn1 [13,14].

Jatropha gossypifolia belongs to the family, “Euphorbiaceae” and the order, “Geraniale”. The common name of J. gossypifolia is bellyache bush, pignut or fignut. In Yoruba land it is known as “Lapalapa” [15]. Jatropha gossypifolia is an erect, monoecious, deciduous, soft wooded and perennial shrub which grows with the average height of 2.5 m but exceeding 4 m in some areas. Its leaves are sticky which are covered with extra-floral nectaries, deeply 3-lobed and bronze when juvenile but green when mature. Flowers are deep red in color with yellow centres. Fruits are triocular, explosively dehiscent capsules having a single seed per locule. Capsules are green in color at maturity which turn pale green before dehiscence and are sparsely hairy. Seeds are spherical, carunculate and greyish-brown with copious starchy endosperm [16]. It is a bushy gregarious shrub which grows mostly throughout India. Its bark contains the alkaloids named jatrophine and a lignin named jatrodien found in the stems [17].

Ethnobotanical uses of J. gossypifolia have been reported for cancer, diarrhea, dysentery, skin diseases (leprosy), arthritis, ulcer, gum infections and wound healing [18,19]. This study was aimed at investigating the occurrence of constituents in Jatropha gossypifolia plant extracts with enzyme inhibition activity against α-glucosidase and α-chymotrypsin enzymes.

Methods

Chemicals and drugs

Enzymes including α-Glucosidase (CAS 9000-81-1 Sigma-Aldrich GmbH USA), and α-Chymotrypsin (CAS 9001-08-5 Sigma- Aldrich GmbH USA), substrates p-nitrophenyl glucopyranoside (CAS1866-15-5 Sigma-Aldrich UK), N-succinyl phenyl-alanine-P-nitroanilide), DTNB 5,5-dithio-bis-nitrobenzoic acid (CAS 69- 78-3 Sigma-Aldrich Germany), Acarbose and Chymosatin Sp. (CAS 1933-04-4 Sigma-Aldrich France) were used for enzyme inhibition study. For preparation of buffer, di-potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4), potassium di-hydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), potassium hydroxide used were of extra pure analytical grade. All the chemicals used in the extraction process were obtained from Merck Group Frankfurter Strabe 25065293 Darmstadt Germany

Plant material

J. gossypifolia was collected from the surroundings of the district of Bhawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan. The plant was identified by Dr Muhammad Arshad (late) of Cholistan Institute of Desert Studies (CIDS) in The Islamia University of Bahawalpur (IUB) and a voucher specimen (no. 3210/CIDS/IUB) was deposited in the CIDS, IUB herbarium for future reference deposited for future reference.

Extraction

Firstly whole plant specimens were collected and the leaves, stem/bark and root portion of the plants were separated. The stem/bark and the root portions were subjected to shade drying whereas the leaves were first ground and the frozen at -20 oC for three days following which they were freeze dried using lyophilizer.

The dried plant material was ground to fine powder. The powdered root portion (1 kg) was initially extracted with dichloromethane (DCM) successively for 72 h and then with methyl alcohol (MA) again for 72 h at room temperature with periodic agitation. The stem/bark powder (1 kg) was also extracted with MA for 7 days with periodic agitation.

The leaves powder (1 kg) was extracted with MA for 7 days with periodic agitation. All of these extracts were filtered and then concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator at 37 oC and was finally obtained as semisolid these extracts were weighed and stored in a refrigerator in air tight vials.

The concentrated methyl alcohol (MA) crude extracts of the leaves portion was further subjected to fractionation with n-hexane (nH), MC, ethyl acetate (EA) and n-butanol (nB) [thrice with each solvent] respectively. The filtrates of the respective fractions thus obtained were concentrated under reduced pressure by rotary evaporator at 37 oC. The respective concentrates were weighed and stored in labeled airtight vial in a refrigerator and named as JGRD (Jatropha gossypifolia roots dichloromethane extract), JGRM (Jatropha gossypifolia root methanol extract), JGLCr (Jatropha gossypifolia leaves crude extract), JGLH (Jatropha gossypifolia leaves hexane extract), JGLD (Jatropha gossypifolia leaves dichloromethane extract), JGLE.

α-Glucosidase assay

The α-glucosidase inhibition activity was performed according to the standard method with slightly modification [20]. Total volume of the reaction mixture of 100 µl contained 70 µl 50 mM phosphate buffer saline, pH 6.8, 10 µl (0.5 mM) test compound, followed by the addition of 10 µl (0.057 units) enzyme. The contents were mixed, preincubated for 10 min at 37 ºC and pre-read at 400 nm. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 10 µl of 0.5 mM substrate (p-nitrophenyl glucopyranoside). Acarbose was used as positive control. After 30 min of incubation at 37 ºC, absorbance was measured at 400 nm using Synergy HT microplate reader. All experiments were carried out in duplicates. Inhibition was calculated as in Eq 1.

Inhibition (%) = {(Control – Test)/Control} 100 …… (1)

where control = total enzyme activity without inhibitor, and test = activity in the presence of test compound.

IC50 values (concentration at which there is 50 % enzyme catalyzed reaction) were calculated using EZ-Fit Enzyme Kinetics Software (Perrella Scientific Inc. Amherst, USA).

α-Chymotrypsin assay

Chymotrypsin inhibition activity was performed according to slightly modified method of Rehman et al. A total volume of 100 μl assay mixture contained 60 μl Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM pH 7.6), 10 μl test compound and 15 μl (0.9 units) purified chymotrypsin enzyme (Sigma, USA). The contents were mixed and incubated for 20 min at 37 oC and pre-read at 410 nm. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 15 μl (1.3 mM) substrate (N-succinyl phenyl-alanine-P-nitroanilide). The change in absorbance was observed after 30 min at 410 nm. Synergy HT (BioTek, USA) 96-well plate reader was used in all experiment. All reactions were performed in triplicates. The positive and negative controls were included in the assay. Chymostatin (0.5 mM well) was used as a positive control. Percentage inhibition was calculated as in Eq 1.

Statistical analysis

Mean ± SEM of the data were calculated and the extract concentration providing 50 % inhibition (IC50) was calculated from the plot of percent inhibition versus extract concentrations in solution, using Microsoft Excel program. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Graph Pad Prism, version 5.01, was used for data analysis

Results

Different extracts and fractions of roots, stem/bark and leaves of Jatropha gossypifolia were tested against the α-glucosidase and α-chymotrypsin enzyme inhibitory activity () and IC50 values were also calculated ().

n-Butanol and ethyl acetate fractions showed maximum % enzyme inhibition for α-glucosidase with 67.93 ± 0.66 and 67.67 ± 0.71 and IC50 of 218.47 ± 0.23 and 213.45 ± 0.12 % enzyme inhibition, respectively. While maximum a-chymotrypsin % inhibition activity was observed with DCM leaves 85.08 ± 0.38, ethyl acetate leaves 83.87 ± 0.71, DCM roots 81.45 ± 0.69, root methanol 75.00 ± 0.99, crude leaves methanol 71.77 ± 0.57 with IC50 values of 133.1 ± 0.68, 34.5 ± 0.12, 129.5 ± 0.17, 118.3 ± 0.29, 121.7 ± 0.19, respectively.

Discussion

The use of medicinal plants is mainly based on local tradition and not on scientific knowledge [21]. The chemical constituents of most of these plants are unknown and may have dangerous effects on human health. On the other hand, some plants, which are not reported to be used in herbal medicine, might also possess potential activity. In traditional practices, numerous plants have been used to treat cognitive disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases and different neuropharmacological disorders. The history of drug discovery has shown that plants contain active compounds that have become new sources to investigate for the pharmaceutical industry [22].

The extracts from Jatropha gossypifolia plants showed significant α-glucosidase activity. α-glucosidases comprises a family of enzymes hydrolase, located in the brush-border surface membrane of small intestinal cells and it is the key enzyme by which the final step of digestion is catalyzed, so glucosidase inhibitors can stop the liberation of D-glucose from complex dietary carbohydrates and can delay the glucose absorption which in turn reduce plasma glucose level and decrease hyperglycemia [23]. Several synthetic glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose, miglitol, voglibose are used as treatment for diabetes but their prices are high and side effects occur [24]. Due to these issues, there has been a search for some other safe and effective glucosidase inhibitors of natural origin in order to develop a physiological functional food and lead compound for diabetic treatment [25,26].

The chymotrypsin enzyme inhibitory activity was performed by using chymostatin as a standard. The relative percent enzyme inhibition along with IC50 of all the extracts and standard were analyzed. Epidemiological studies demonstrating a decrease in occurrence of breast, colon and prostatic cancers in vegetarian populations has suggested the role of plant proteinase inhibitors in preventing these cancers. A soybean-derived Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor (BBI) either inhibits or prevents development of experimentally induced colon, oral, lung, liver and esophageal cancers. This anti carcinogenic effect of the Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor is thought to stem from its ability to inhibit chymotrypsin enzyme activity [27].

Conclusion

In the light of these findings, we can conclude that the plant extracts screened herein showed inhibitory activity against both of the enzymes and they could be considered for further studies in the treatment of diabetes and ulcer as natural remedy. Further works related to the isolation of the active constituents through bioassay-directed fractionation are in progress in our laboratory.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express sincere thanks to Chairman, Faculty of Pharmacy and Alternative Medicine for providing support and necessary facilities to carry out this work.

References

  1. Paun G. Evaluation of Geranium spp., Helleborus spp. and Hyssopus spp. polyphenolic extracts inhibitory activity against urease and α-chymotrypsin. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2013; 29(1): 28-34.
  2. Mosolov VL, Grigoreva, Valueva T. Plant proteinase inhibitors as multifunctional proteins (review). Appl Biochem Microbiol.  2001; 37(6): 545-551.
  3. Bell GI. Molecular defects in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1991; 40(4):  413-422.
  4. Gin H, Rigalleau. Post-prandial hyperglycemia. Post-prandial hyperglycemia and diabetes. 2008.
  5. Naquvi KJ. REVIEW ON ROLE OF NATURAL Î ‘LPHA-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITORS FOR MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS. Int J Biomed Res. 2011; 2(6): 374-380.
  6. Qaisar MN. Evaluation of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of dichloromethane and methanol extracts of Croton bonplandianum Baill. Trop J Pharm Res. 2014; 13(11):  1833-1836.
  7. Matsuda HN, Nishida, Yoshikawa M. Antidiabetic principles of natural medicines. V. Aldose reductase inhibitors from Myrcia multiflora DC (2): Structures of myrciacitrins III, IV, and V. Chem Pharm Bull Tokyo. 2002; 50(3): 429-431.
  8. Coblentz A, Coblentz D. Treatment of peptic ulcer with chymotrypsin and an antibiotic. Mil Med. 1966; 131(2): 150.
  9. Blanco-Aparicio C. Potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor, a T-knot protein, is an epidermal growth factor antagonist that inhibits tumor cell growth. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(20):  12370-12377.
  10. Kennedy AR. Preparation and production of a cancer chemopreventive agent, Bowman‐Birk inhibitor concentrate. 1993.
  11. Kanner J, Lapidot T. The stomach as a bioreactor: dietary lipid peroxidation in the gastric fluid and the effects of plant-derived antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001; 31(11): 1388-1395.
  12. Gurbuz I. Anti-ulcerogenic effect of Momordica charantia L. fruits on various ulcer models in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000; 71(1):  77-82.
  13. Wermuth. The practice of medicinal chemistry. 2011; Academic Press.
  14. Czinner E. The in vitro effect of Helichrysi flos on microsomal lipid peroxidation. J of Ethnopharmacol. 2001; 77(1): 31-35.
  15. Odebiyi O, Sofowora E. Phytochemical screening of Nigerian medicinal plants II. Lloydia, 1977; 41(3): 234-246.
  16. Dehgan B, Webster GL. Morphology and infrageneric relationships of the genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). 1979; 74: Univ of California Press.
  17. Matsuse I. A search for anti-viral properties in Panamanian medicinal plants: The effects on HIV and its essential enzymes. J of Ethnopharmacol. 1998; 64(1): 15-22.
  18. Misra M, Misra AN. Jatropha: the biodiesel plant biology, tissue culture and genetic transformation–a review. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2010; 1(1): 11-24.
  19. Dash SK, Padhy S. Review on ethnomedicines for diarrhoea diseases from Orissa: prevalence versus culture. J Hum Ecol. 2006; 20(1): 59-64.
  20. Dong HQ. Inhibitory potential of trilobatin from Lithocarpus polystachyus Rehd against α-glucosidase and α-amylase linked to type 2 diabetes. Food Chem. 2012; 130(2): 261-266.
  21. Ali-Shtayeh MS, Jamous RM.  Herbal preparation use by patients suffering from cancer in Palestine. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2011; 17(4): 235-240.
  22. Adewusi EA, Moodley N, Steenkamp V. Medicinal plants with cholinesterase inhibitory activity: a review. 2010.
  23. Lebovitz HE. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 1997; 26(3): 539-551.
  24. Scott LJ, Spencer CM. Miglitol. Drugs. 2000; 59(3):  521-549.
  25. Matsui T. α-Glucosidase inhibitory action of natural acylated anthocyanins. 2. α-Glucosidase inhibition by isolated acylated anthocyanins. J Agr Food Chem. 2001; 49(4): 1952-1956.
  26. McDougall G. Anthocyanins from red wine–their stability under simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Phytochem. 2005; 66(21): 2540-2548.
  27. Witschi H, Kennedy AR.  Modulation of lung tumor development in mice with the soybean-derived Bowman—Birk protease inhibitor. Carcinogenesis. 1989; 10(12): 2275-2277.
Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates